<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T2i gets some HDR love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hdriblog.com/t2i-gets-some-hdr-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hdriblog.com/t2i-gets-some-hdr-love/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:29:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Celino</title>
		<link>http://hdriblog.com/t2i-gets-some-hdr-love/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Celino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 15:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdriblog.com/?p=339#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Increasing their current limit of 3 AEB is a very simple software change. Canon is basically screwing with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increasing their current limit of 3 AEB is a very simple software change. Canon is basically screwing with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael James</title>
		<link>http://hdriblog.com/t2i-gets-some-hdr-love/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdriblog.com/?p=339#comment-60</guid>
		<description>If in fact it is just 3 AEB and +/-2EV that sucks.  I guess the fact that Canon has expanded the exposure compensation to +/-5EV they somehow think this is going to be beneficial to a single AEB sequence?  Please.  What a joke.

Seems idiotic they put in language as to how this is beneficial to the HDR shooter unless they did in fact change the past Rebel AEB settings.

I will say though that if the T2i gets the 7D&#039;s AEB of +/-3EV for an AEB sequence, that would at least be a welcomed improvement....

... but 3 AEB still sucks.

Look folks.  I love Canon.  I just bought a 5D mark II recently to shoot along with other Nikon/Sigma bodies, but the 5D mark II is a very high end camera and yet still the same crappy 3AEB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in fact it is just 3 AEB and +/-2EV that sucks.  I guess the fact that Canon has expanded the exposure compensation to +/-5EV they somehow think this is going to be beneficial to a single AEB sequence?  Please.  What a joke.</p>
<p>Seems idiotic they put in language as to how this is beneficial to the HDR shooter unless they did in fact change the past Rebel AEB settings.</p>
<p>I will say though that if the T2i gets the 7D&#8217;s AEB of +/-3EV for an AEB sequence, that would at least be a welcomed improvement&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230; but 3 AEB still sucks.</p>
<p>Look folks.  I love Canon.  I just bought a 5D mark II recently to shoot along with other Nikon/Sigma bodies, but the 5D mark II is a very high end camera and yet still the same crappy 3AEB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Abramson</title>
		<link>http://hdriblog.com/t2i-gets-some-hdr-love/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Abramson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdriblog.com/?p=339#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I just assumed it would bracket 5 shots at once.  I guess I was wrong.  This seems like such a simple request.  There is no doubt this will be coming in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just assumed it would bracket 5 shots at once.  I guess I was wrong.  This seems like such a simple request.  There is no doubt this will be coming in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Cooley</title>
		<link>http://hdriblog.com/t2i-gets-some-hdr-love/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Cooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdriblog.com/?p=339#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Nikon has stubbornly refused to address their 1stop AEB limitation.  Canon pro bodies have had expanded AEB functionality for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon has stubbornly refused to address their 1stop AEB limitation.  Canon pro bodies have had expanded AEB functionality for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Washer</title>
		<link>http://hdriblog.com/t2i-gets-some-hdr-love/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Washer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdriblog.com/?p=339#comment-54</guid>
		<description>The T1i has a +/-4EV range for exposure compensation.  The AEB settings are 3 exposures up to +/-2EV, plus exposure compensation from -4 to +4.  I think, without any more to go on than anybody else, that the only change here is the +/-4EV range has been expanded to +/-5EV.  They might let AEB expand to +/-3EV, but Canon has said nothing to imply that there will be any choice of additional exposures, like the Nikon does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The T1i has a +/-4EV range for exposure compensation.  The AEB settings are 3 exposures up to +/-2EV, plus exposure compensation from -4 to +4.  I think, without any more to go on than anybody else, that the only change here is the +/-4EV range has been expanded to +/-5EV.  They might let AEB expand to +/-3EV, but Canon has said nothing to imply that there will be any choice of additional exposures, like the Nikon does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skreid</title>
		<link>http://hdriblog.com/t2i-gets-some-hdr-love/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Skreid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdriblog.com/?p=339#comment-53</guid>
		<description>It looks like it will still only allow for 3 shots AEB, but instead of a max of -2,0,+2 you&#039;ll be able to go to -5, 0, +5. Its a shame that it won&#039;t be able to AEB more than 3 shots, it&#039;d be nice to capture -5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,+1,+2,+3,+4,+5 in one go with one shutter press, but I doubt the 550D can do it without some tweaking mid shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like it will still only allow for 3 shots AEB, but instead of a max of -2,0,+2 you&#8217;ll be able to go to -5, 0, +5. Its a shame that it won&#8217;t be able to AEB more than 3 shots, it&#8217;d be nice to capture -5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,+1,+2,+3,+4,+5 in one go with one shutter press, but I doubt the 550D can do it without some tweaking mid shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
