Merge to HDR Tip

I found this little known fact out first hand when I was first experimenting with different tone mapping operators a few years back.  I was testing out the various softwares that will take your bracketed shots and “Merge to HDR” to create either a .hdr or .exr.  Turns out the act of merging to a High Dynamic Range Image using bracketed images, can be and IS unique amongst the various apps on the market.

The process the application goes through to merge to hdr  is not as standardized as I thought it would (or should be) and is slightly differently with various apps (done under the hood with their code).  Hence the reason that merging raw files to save in one app and then opening that .hdr or .exr in another app could and can does lead to different results than just using that 2nd app to merge and then tonemap the same files.  One would think that it should be a standardized formula that would lead to the same .hdr / .exr.  But as it turns out… different chefs make different dishes despite starting out with the same ingredients.

So the next time you are planning to use an application to provide automation (merge to hdr for dozens of folders) using one app, then tonemapping those .hdr / .exr saved files in a totally different app… you should know what the tendency of the original app you are using to merge “tends” to do (create).  Color, saturation, etc…

Just a little HDR tip to close out the 2009 year.

Posted by Michael James on Dec 31 2009 in Basics and Terminology, HDR, software Tags: , , , ,

HDR Darkroom Mac Beta 1.2

I received another email about HDR Darkroom and a 1.2 release of the mac beta.  Here is the landing page for the download and specs.

http://www.hdrdarkroom.com/download.htm

I never posted about the 1.0 version of the Mac Beta because I never received an answer back from the developer about why it wouldn’t load on my macs (despite meeting the required specs).  Unfortunately the same is true for this 1.2 update.  I have only bothered to try and load it on my macs. It still will not load on either my MacPro or iMac running (both running 10.4.11).

I’ve submitted another email to the developer about the inability to launch the program and I will report back once the problem has been solved.  I realize it is a relatively new app and likely a small dev team so I am willing to at least mention it here on the blog despite the app not loading and the developer being non-responsive to previous support requests.

Until I can get a response from the developer I will continue to use Essential HDR on my PC http://www.imagingluminary.com which is currently the gold standard for realistic tonemapping.

Essential HDR is also in beta testing on the Mac and I will report when it is available and out of beta.

Posted by Michael James on Dec 27 2009 in HDR, software Tags: , ,

Tonemapping is not HDR

I’m not starting a war over this, but I would like to shed some light here.  Hell, I think the concept needs to be tonemapped to reveal the details in the shadows (blatant pun intended).

Anyone have any online resources linked they can send me?  I’m looking for links online that explain what tonemapping is as well as why tonemapping is necessary for 8bit viewing and printing. [[[ HINT: Anything viewable on the web or in print is NOT hdr. ]]]  If you didn’t even know this much then the links I post from users or an example I create myself if necessary will hopefully shed some light on the matter.

I’d rather not recreate the wheel and just link to current resources.  If there are none out there that clarify the concept for mere mortals then I’ll have to do so myself (only if necessary).  It needs to be simple enough so that my mom can understand.  She can barely use a DVR so she is my ultimate technology challenged litmus test.  If you have a link that cuts through technical jargon, send it to me and I’ll post it.

No comments on this post.  Send the links through my contact page (use navigation above).

If I don’t get responses or if the links provided to me can’t be understood by my mom, then I guess I’ll have to step up to the plate and create an example myself… but I’d love to save the time and just link to current resources.

Posted by Michael James on Dec 23 2009 in Basics and Terminology, HDR, software, training Tags: , ,

Pentax K-x initial test

The Pentax K-x arrived today.  I don’t want to ramble on about all the features and such yet because I have not played with it enough to pass judgement on it yet.  I just want to post this three up image of shots I snapped just before a partly cloudy sunset ended here today.  It shows (top to bottom) HDR Capture Mode “Strong”, then HDR Capture Mode “Standard”, then no HDR Mode and just one simple frame.

The image is of one of the public beach access points here.   It has not only rained at this location recently, but one of the natural dune lakes that sits against the beach (100 yards north of the gulf) broke through one of its natural walls (sand) some dark brackish waters spilled onto the beach.  Hence the wet and dirty strip of sand you’ll see.  It is a naturally occurring thing here where some of these lakes sit.  Only Australia has similar dune lakes naturally occurring like we have here along the Emerald Coast of North West Florida.  The lakes are large and beautiful and allow you to canoe vast areas just hundreds of yards from the gulf of mexico.  They run right up against many beach points.

When it rains here, certain dune lakes will sometimes overflow and spill into the gulf itself and salt water and lake waters will flow back and forth and then seal back up again when weather calms down.  Sometimes a lake wall just oozes a little lake water onto the beach area as it did this time.  It happens a few times a year and within a few weeks the powdery white sand covers the darker sand back up again as if it never happened.  This generally occurs in the fall/spring outside of tourist season.  However, we have had unusually horrible weather here the last two weeks with virtually no sun and many rainy days.  The dune lakes have filled up and this particular one spilled over onto this beach.

I say all this because I don’t want you to think those dark areas are an artifact from the HDR mode versions captured (below).  The HDR mode and tonemapping did NOT have to do with this strip of dark sand.  It was the lake overflow.

The images below were simply resized down.  All three are JPEGs right out of camera.  The HDR mode fires off a 3 frame AEB and the final image is a tonemapped JPEG.  I purposely chose a shot that is not something any camera sensor can handle in one shot.  The image on the bottom is one simple frame with no HDR mode.  As you can see, the sun despite being shielded slightly by clouds, still blows out badly and much of the water reflection is also blown out.  The middle image is using the camera’s HDR Mode set to “Standard” and the top image is using the camera’s HDR mode set to “Strong”.  No photoshop or post tweaks.  The saturation differences are a result of the merging (tonemapping) process and I can’t control that.  Although I did have the camera setting set to “standard” for color.  I’ll experiement with “Vibrant” and the like in the future to see variations.

I was in a rush and by mistake I had the camera set to auto white balance (ugh!!!).  So color differences are probably even less scientific between shots given that idiotic oversight.  BTW, this was not a planned shoot… I just rushed down when the cloud cover broke and snapped a few shots.  I shot in Aperture priority mode for each.  The clouds moved of course… the HDR Capture Mode takes 3 shots bracketed and then it takes about 10+ seconds for the camera to merge the shots before you can retake another shot, so there is no way to show you a true comparison with the sky moving as briskly as it was.  The 3 shot burst itself is quick.  The camera sports a 4.7 fps speed, but the merging process takes time.

So what you see below is not bracketed shots taken into post, merged and then tweaked.  These are right out of camera JPEGs, but there is obviously some tone mapping operator doing some work in camera.  The “Strong” is definitely too intense for my commercial work and “Standard” while less intense is borderline workable for what I do… but I’ll wait until I’ve put it through a bunch of tests and interior architectural shoots.

K-x quick test of HDR Capture Mode

K-x quick test of HDR Capture Mode

Weather is supposed to stay crappy here for almost another week so it may be some time before I get around to getting this camera pushed through a true test run and then posting results.  But I will ASAP.

For instant gratification, the K-x rocks.  No long merge to HDR time in post.  Just shoot and in 10-12 seconds you can see the JPEG and change your settings to reshoot.  Oh, and that reminds me to mention that you can of course use the exposure compensation….

… the Pentax K-x allows for +/- 3.0EV so you can easily control where the base exposure will begin.  And of course I’ll be experimenting with taking multiple HDR captures taken at various +/-EV settings and then use those JPEGs to merge in post to see if anything interesting comes from it or if it is not beneficial.  We’ll see.  Merging tonemapped jpegs?  Can you say “artifacts”?  Probably.  But I just have to do it for the hell of it.

Oh #2… the AEB function allows for a traditional 3 AEB burst at +/-3.0EV.  You can bracket as little as .3 and it goes up by steps of .3 right up to a full +/-3.0 EV like a Canon 7D or Sigma SD14 does (both of them shoot a 3 AEB which can max out at +/-3.0EV).

More to come when weather breaks for the better.

Posted by Michael James on Dec 11 2009 in Camera Companies, HDR, review Tags: , , , , , ,

New Canon EF Mount lenses by Carl Zeiss

Carl Zeiss is adding two more EF mount lenses to their lineup. Already available in the Nikon F mount, they are adding two new EF mount offerings; the Makro-Planar T* 2/50 and the Makro-Planar T* 2/100.

The Makro-Planar T* 2/100 already has a reputation of STUNNING sharpness. If you’ve used it, you know.  Canon users are about to get to experience it firsthand (early 2010). The images below are the Nikon mounts because Zeiss doesn’t have an EF mount image online.

======= Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/100 ========
Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/100
The Makro-Planar T* 2/100 ZE will be available from beginning of 2010 at a recommended retail price of € 1.385,71 (excluding VAT)*.

======= Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/50 =========
Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/50

The Makro-Planar T* 2/50 ZE is available in December 2009 at a recommended retail price of € 965,55 (excluding VAT)*.

MY TAKE:

I think Zeiss missed a window of uniqueness and opportunity.  They should have released the Makro-Planar T* 2/100 ZE last year before Canon upped the ante with their new 100mm f/2.8 L series lens with IS. Granted, the canon isn’t f/2, but it is much cheaper than the Zeiss which doesn’t have autofocus or stabilization.  However, if you want amazing performance at f/2… Zeiss will deliver.

Canon does make a 100mm f/2 lens, but it is dated (older design).  I can tell you from experience… canon’s 100mm f/2 is priced at $400 for a reason.  It ain’t an L and it ain’t a Zeiss.

Posted by Michael James on Dec 5 2009 in Camera Companies, Lenses Tags: , ,

HDR Cameras – 2009 All-Stars

Jack Howard has put together a great list of top class HDR capable cameras over at Adorama’s Learning Center.  Check out the list here:   2009 HDR All-Stars

——————-

For you iPhone addicts, check out the very interesting app that allows you to take two images and they get tonemapped in the iPhone.  The app is called TrueHDR =  http://pictional.com/TrueHDR/Videos.html

——————-

Here is a recent shoot I did for an existing client. On this shoot I used a D3 exclusively and many of the shots required a range of -5 to +5 EV in total.
Builder Shoot (Gallery Link)

——————-

Here is a link to a High Dynamic Range Image sequence.  It is a “tilt” sequence I shot at a local garden near a state park.  This series was shot with a D3 and each frame is actually 7 images spaced 1EV apart and then tonemapped before being placed one after the other in post.

The amount of quality lost when exporting to a web video format is horrifying, but I have no choice.  The full 1080p version has no loss of color, detail/clarity or color shifts.  That said, here is the link to the web clip:
HDR Video (link to landing page)


Posted by Michael James on Dec 4 2009 in Camera Companies, HDR, Video, software, training Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Affordable HDR – Pentax K-x

Rather than hash out every single detail, I’ll link to Pentax USA’s site below to the K-x.  However, a few notable features that I’m amazed to see on a $599 DSLR+Kit Lens combo:

  • Sensor shift stabilization (up to 4 stops) for stills AND video
  • 720p HD at 24fps
  • 4.7 FPS in continuous shutter
  • 1/6000 second shutter
  • HDR Capture Mode (processed in camera for you to a JPEG)

The Pentax K-x I kind of let slip by without mention.  It also has the HDR capture mode of the K-7 (where it takes 3 bracketed shots and auto processes in camera to a tonemapped JPEG).  However, it does NOT have the AEB capabilities of the K-7, but for 1/2 the price of a K-7 of course there are always compromises. I just saw that the K-x + kit lens is only $599 so I am just going to have to get one and post a review on it in the next 30 days.

Hell, the thing even does 720p at 24fps native. Probably not super high quality, but at this price point… a no brainer for a small form factor DSLR.

More info here: http://www.pentaximaging.com/slr/K-x_Black/

Posted by Michael James on Dec 3 2009 in Camera Companies, HDR, Video Tags: , , , ,